deborahjross: (Deb and Cleo)
I've been deep in the throes of reviewing copy-edits for the longest work I've ever attempted. Actually, the first volume of it. The story began with a short piece for Sword and Sorceress, back when Marion edited it. I'd been reading about the Scythians, nomadic warlike horse people who kept the Romans at bay for many years, so I used that cultural tension for "The Spirit Arrow." The world and its peoples kept drawing me back, so I wrote 3 other "Azkhantian tales." And, eventually, a trilogy. Oh, around 400,000 words total. The first book, The Seven-Petaled Shield, comes out from DAW in June, with the other 2 at about 6-month intervals.

Now, "Shield" isn't a series. It's one long story that took 3 books to tell, like The Lord of the Rings. No one would ever describe that work as a series. But I found [livejournal.com profile] swan_tower's observations just as valid for this long form as for a "set" (same world, maybe same characters, stand-alone stories) or a series. Come to think of it, her insights work for single novels as well...

Originally posted by [livejournal.com profile] swan_tower at How to write a long fantasy series


On the basis of my re-read, and comparing to other series that attempt similar tasks, I have come to believe there is a single, fundamental principle, underlying all the other points I’ll make throughout this post, which governs the author’s ability to keep the narrative from spinning wildly out of control, to the detriment of their story.

It’s simple:

PICK A STRUCTURE, AND STICK TO IT.

Most of us, when we set out to write a novel, have at least a vague sense of how long it’s going to be. We can be off in that estimate -- In Ashes Lie ran about thirty thousand words longer than I originally intended -- but generally speaking, you know that you’re aiming for 60K or 100K or 200K, and you use that to guide a thousand decisions you make along the way. Should you introduce new subplots, or is it time to start tying things up? Does your protagonist’s next action need some complications along the way, or would it be better to just handle it offscreen and move on to more important things? Can you bring in a new character for this strand, or should you find a way to take care of things with the characters you already have? These are questions of pacing, and we’ll come back to that a bunch of times along the way. But you can’t gauge your pace when you don’t know how long the race will be: at best, you’ll end up going through the whole thing with a steady, slogging, workhorse pace that (to switch metaphors) loses all sense of dynamics.
deborahjross: (Deb and Cleo)
Over on my blog, Margaret Yang and Harry R. Campion, who write together as M. H. Mead, talk about why they consider their books a set instead of a series. I think this is a distinction worth considering, for both newer writers and those of us who've been around for a bit.

Readers often fall in love with a world and its characters (and we as writers do that, too, but we also experience a natural reluctance to start again completely from scratch with a new project when we have a richly developed landscape, cultures, and history -- not to mention fabulous characters -- just begging for more adventures!) This temptation is not without risk. One is that if the reading satisfaction and completeness of each book is dependent on having read all that has come before, you're setting up a scenario for decreasing sales. This is perhaps less a problem with epublishing, when books remain "in print" essentially forever, than it was when a mass market paperback's shelf life was measured in days before it was swept away to make room for the next release. Readers are naturally reluctant to pick up a book in the middle of such a series.
Read more... )
deborahjross: (Default)
Jennifer Laughran, an agent at Andrea Brown Literary Agency, offers some thoughts on new writers and series:

Lots of unpublished writers query and say something like: "This is the first book in a series. Books 2 and 3 are complete, I am working on book 4 now!"

This makes me sigh. I read that and see a person who is stuck completely on one story, who is not ready to be flexible and diversify, learn and grow. Not to rain on your parade, but... what if Book 1 is actually fundamentally flawed and you are building a house of sequels on a shoddy foundation? What if it never finds a home? Then all the energy that you spent on sequels is wasted, when you could have been off finding more stories and inventing even more awesome worlds.

The other day a very nice Twitterer inquired during #AskAgent something like (paraphrasing): "I've had book one out on submission for some time... when should I start querying agents on book 2?"

Not to be mean, really, but what's the point? Nobody can take on and sell JUST book 2 if it has to be a series. And nobody has picked up book 1. Sooo....

"Well, I'll just self-publish then!"




Jennifer Represents...: How NOT to write a series, OR, Don't put all your eggs in one basket.

Profile

deborahjross: (Default)
Deborah J. Ross

November 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 27th, 2025 07:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios