deborahjross: (halidragon)
Originally posted by [livejournal.com profile] spiziks at Aran and the Scammers

I was at the hardware store--my version of the shoe store--when I received a text from Aran: "I got a call from a computer company saying that there are errors on my laptop. They are getting rid of them, but the bad part is that the charge is $500."

I froze.  This was a scam.  I've heard of it.  I've gotten it.  A guy calls, claims to be from Microsoft, and says there are errors on the computer.  They'll fix them for a fee.  It's an obvious scam, simplicity in itself to spot--unless you're autistic and naturally trusting.

I called Aran.  "Did you give them your debit card number?"

"Yes," he said.

By now I was running toward the door.

Read more... )


deborahjross: (Default)
Originally posted by [livejournal.com profile] beth_bernobich at if you looked up 'exploitive' in the dictionary...
...you'd find a picture of this publisher.

Tired of the publishing rat race? Have some un-sold novels in your trunk? Posh Books will take those books off your hands forever.

And I do mean forever. This outfit pays between $150 and $200 for all rights, for all time. Basically, they are purchasing the copyright to your book. They might or might not edit the book. They might or might not put your name on the cover. They might even change the story completely.

In their own words, they "are taking advantage of other people's missing knowledge/indifference/ignorance," but their excuse is that "nobody is forcing anyone into doing something they don't want to."

See here for the relevant thread on AW.
deborahjross: (Default)
... and I do use the word "discussion" extremely generally. You've probably seen various postings about TWA (I always have a moment of "TransWorld Airlines" time-lag) and their inane and paranoid vilification of the folks of Writer Beware, and assorted others. If you haven't, or even if you have, I encourage you to read Jim Hines's thoughts, the first paragraphs of which are included below. Then skip to my musings.

Originally posted by [livejournal.com profile] jimhines at The Write Agenda vs. Writer Beware

Some of you have seen this particular mess by now. For anyone unfamiliar with Writer Beware, they are “the public face of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America’s Committee on Writing Scams.” This group has provided invaluable information on how to avoid the scammers and the bottom-feeders for as long as I’ve been writing. Ann Crispin, Victoria Strauss, and Richard White volunteer countless hours in order to track, document, and share information on writing scams and pitfalls. Their blog should be required reading for pretty much anyone hoping to make a career in this business.


The Write Agenda is “a group of individuals, writers, want-to-be authors and inquisitive wordsmiths that have become ‘literally’ numb from reading the numerous author help related blog posts.” This group provides invaluable information on that time Victoria Strauss used the f-word on her Facebook page. This site should be required reading for pretty much anyone hoping to be a bottom-feeding douchebag.



Like Jim, I wonder if I have not been doing my job as watchdog and educator because I'm not on TWA's "Banned" list and -- as far as I know -- they're not asking people to send them copies of my books so they can burn them. (An appropriate response might be to run out and buy those books -- there's some great reading on the list!) Also like Jim, I wonder about the psychology (or rather, psychopathology) of folks who apparently have nothing better to do with their time than to put up such material. I have seen no hint of anyone racing to their defense, only "don't believe this stuff" or "geesh!" My first impulse is to stick them in the category of "People Behaving Badly In Public."

It's way too easy to poke fun at TWA. I suspect that one of the reasons the issue has gone viral is how ridiculous TWA's accusations are. Are we giving them a credibility they would not otherwise have by posting and reposting our responses? Or is it a bad idea to let such nonsense go unremarked and unanswered? Do we risk some poor naive newie taking this stuff seriously?

To me. the TWA site represents one of the less palatable uses of the internet. The combination of ease of publicity and anonymity makes it all too easy to indulge in insults, promulgate offensive falsehoods, etc., etc., you know the drill, all without the risk of being held accountable. Whatever else the people behind TWA want, I can safely say it isn't constructive dialog.

Above, I made a reference to folks who have nothing better to do with their time. As obnoxious and hilariously inept as the TWA statements/charges/charts/etc. are, they are also futile. They result in nothing of value. These people say they are writers or wannabee writers, yet they pour time and energy into this pathetic excuse for a "good cause." I thought, Gosh I could have written several novels in the time it must have taken to research all that.

By all means, let's be alert to the line between blathering and libel, and yes, let's make a public statement of what Writer Beware is and why we are grateful to the people who expose scam agents and the like. But let's also not forget that those who lash out like TWA, so ineffectually and irrationally, are most likely either mentally ill or in pain or deeply confused. Let's not make fun of that.
deborahjross: (Default)
I guess amazon.com has now achieved scam notoriety, along with banks, foreign governments, and various Nigerian personages:

Amazon - Account reactivation form,

Because of possible unauthorized access, we have temporarily
deactivated your account.

To remove the suspension, please confirm that your card was not
stolen.
To do this, please download and complete the attached html form.

We are sorry for the inconvenience, but your security is our top
priority.

Kind Regards,
Customer Service
deborahjross: (Default)
Laura Resnick discusses self-publishing, vanity presses, and professional publishing. Much of this I've read before in one form or another, particularly in blogs on the Harlequin s/c/a/m DellArte line. But Laura has a wonderful way of cutting to the chase. This reminds me of a time when I was doing a book signing and a young man informed me that because I was commercially published, I had completely sold out to the system.

The argument that self-publishing offers artistic freedom is most often an excuse used to rationalize the lack of dogged, enduring, committed persistence that is--the single most essential--ingredient (more so than talent, frankly) needed to break into publishing as a writer and to maintain a career in this--highly-- competitive profession.

“Artistic freedom” is also an argument used to evade acknowledging the very real possibility that an aspiring writer’s work simply might not be ready for professional publication yet. Writing a novel is not a natural talent that flows freely from your muse-blessed fingers. It’s a difficult craft that takes years of dedicated practice to develop to a professional level. Not working enough on their craft is one of the two most common mistakes made by aspiring writers.

The--other--most common mistake of aspiring writers is not educating themselves about the highly competitive, demanding profession that they aspire to enter—which is precisely why so many aspiring writers misunderstand the crucial differences between a PUBLISHING business model and a PRINT business model. And also why a percentage of aspiring writers fall prey to costly vanity scams.

Profile

deborahjross: (Default)
Deborah J. Ross

November 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 14th, 2026 07:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios