deborahjross: (Default)
Deborah J. Ross ([personal profile] deborahjross) wrote2009-08-12 12:16 pm

Why readers stop reading...

Check out Nathan Bransford's blog on why (and at what point) readers give up on a book. It's fascinating -- and instructive to us writers.

The people posting fall into several categories. Some, a minority I think, are compulsive finishers. Others are either so critical or so stressed for time, they give a book only a few pages, a chapter at most, to hook them. Most seem to be somewhere in between -- they'll hang in there for 30-100 pages.

Many commented that if a book has been recommended (or they've enjoyed other books by the same author), they will give it more time. Others mentioned specific turn-offs, ranging from content (I just put down a book which combined glorification of the military, a dystopic world, and killing a dog, all in the first chapter -- I would probably read on if it were only one, not all 3) to prose technique (telling not showing, weird tenses).

The single most cited reason for giving up on a book? "IT'S BORING." Granted, one reader's "boring" is another reader's "brilliant," but I am struck by how many bloggers used the same word.

When and why do you give up on a book? What makes a book boring to you?

[identity profile] deborahjross.livejournal.com 2009-08-12 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Then there are the books whose prose is positively noxious. Damaging to a writer's mentality, especially when enhanced by the authority of print. I can't read Dan Brown, no matter how others rave about his story telling. His prose is so bad and in all the wrong ways, that if I read any amount of it, it starts worming its way into my own prose. Ack, it sprains my mind!