deborahjross: (hands)
Deborah J. Ross ([personal profile] deborahjross) wrote2012-04-12 11:42 am
Entry tags:

How Wealth Reduces Compassion

From Scientific American:

But why would wealth and status decrease our feelings of compassion for others? After all, it seems more likely that having few resources would lead to selfishness. Piff and his colleagues suspect that the answer may have something to do with how wealth and abundance give us a sense of freedom and independence from others. The less we have to rely on others, the less we may care about their feelings. This leads us towards being more self-focused. Another reason has to do with our attitudes towards greed. Like Gordon Gekko, upper-class people may be more likely to endorse the idea that “greed is good.” Piff and his colleagues found that wealthier people are more likely to agree with statements that greed is justified, beneficial, and morally defensible. These attitudes ended up predicting participants’ likelihood of engaging in unethical behavior.

How Wealth Reduces Compassion: Scientific American

yep

[identity profile] sillylilly-bird.livejournal.com 2012-04-12 06:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I noticed this a long time ago. This being the inverse relationship between wealth and compassion. I don't get it.

Re: yep

[identity profile] deborahjross.livejournal.com 2012-04-12 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
That's where the research comes in, teasing out factors. I suspect the "greed is good" attitude has a lot to do with it, giving money (and other inanimate things) privilege over human beings.