deborahjross: (Default)
Deborah J. Ross ([personal profile] deborahjross) wrote2011-01-07 01:00 pm
Entry tags:

Anti-Zombie Rant

Does anyone else find zombies utterly uninteresting, tedious and faintly nauseating? I don't want to read about them and I certainly don't want to watch them. I can hardly wait until they are completely passé.

One writer who did something interesting with the shambling-rotting-flesh routine was Andre Norton (I think in Perilous Dreams) where the virus itself had a sort of intelligence that drove the decomposing victim to see out a new host. She did not, of course, use the word zombie, and she described the disease more from the psychological horror of a half-dead person wanting to infect you with what was killing it than with any description of gore or gunfire. It seriously creeped me out, whereas modern zombies leave me thinking that filling out my tax returns might be an interesting and pleasant way to pass the time.

Re: Zombies, tax forms, and brains

[identity profile] deborahjross.livejournal.com 2011-01-08 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Zombies, maybe. Vampires, gotta disagree. They are much more about sexual power than governmental conspiracies.

Re: Zombies, tax forms, and brains

[identity profile] davetrow.livejournal.com 2011-01-09 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
Well, the American people are getting screwed by the government and by corporations. But I agree, the real dynamics of vampire stories are power and sex.

Still, the metaphor of undying creatures that fear the light has interesting resonances for corporate and governmental power. Anybody want to cast Julian Assange as Dr. Van Helsing?